What about the extra band criteria?

[ptalbot]

The only time I see them is for the reviews I've given, not the one I received... I think it would be better to display them to the recipient wouldn't it???

[cjdenecia]

[ptalbot]

I see. I think it will be helpful.
But I understand your TODO list is probably bigger than the time you have on your hands.

[cjdenecia]

[HUD]

You had to be Gold Member (having paid $$) at Garageband.com to read those kind of stats. Would certainly be cool if we could read a summary of how we'd fared in the various categories.

[cjdenecia]

[HUD]

Funny, I just now realize that the songs I've recorded or helped that've completed rd 1 actually all belong to Troll & Kim...so you'd think they might see it fit to send me a screenshot, eh?

[ptalbot]

Hum... so I just realized that this score is actually only available to the band itself.
I think it should be visible by anyone. Be more transparent with the ratings.
You want honesty and integrity, you said... Be open with the results.

I think too much of the review system is a black box right now.
The blind principle is great while you write your review, but then after that the results should be part of the song history and visible to all.

[HUD]

This transparency might seem like a good idea, but I think a band might consider it bad PR to have bad scores on display. Publishing the weekly (monthly?) top scores in the various categories of a genre might be a good further use of the stats... probably somewhere down that to-do list.

[cjdenecia]

hmmmm .... I see both sides of that coin clearly. we might should go in steps. noting the leaders of categories first and then polling for public transparency.

[Krispy]

[mistertroll]

[Krispy]

[HUD]

Only one that's through rd 1. Thanks.

Your turn, Troll... pm would be fine. Thank you in advance.

[Krispy]